![]() ![]() ![]() If the height of a student is picked at random, the picked number has a higher chance to be closer to the median height than being classified as very tall or very short. For example, the height of the students in a school tends to follow a normal distribution around the median height. However, the pool of numbers may follow a specific distribution. The pool of numbers is almost always independent from each other. I just want to avoid being accidentally bamboozled on the slim chance that it's actually not just a superficial change.A random number is a number chosen from a pool of limited or unlimited numbers that has no discernible pattern for prediction. 18 on RNG Reporter = 19 on Pokefinder) that's all well and good. If its just a numerical change that yields the same results (ie. Is there any reason for this change or was RNG Reporter just displaying the wrong calibration and the "new and improved" Pokefinder has simply remedied that? ![]() Is there any reason for the calibration change from RNG Reporter to Pokefinder? I have hatched probably a 6 or 7 Adamant nature shinies at that frame using RNG Reporter's 18 calibration (verified originally through Spinda breeding and matching the dots/PID). When I change the calibration from 18 to 19, though, that same shiny frame-6441-appears. Searching the same parameters on Pokefinder yields no results. This is with no Everstone and compatibility of "The two seem to get along." My calibration according to RNG Reporter is 18. According to RNG Reporter I have an Adamant shiny frame with 0 redraws at 1:59.96, or frame 6441. I know Admiral Fish is on this sub so I figured I'd post this here, but I have recently swapped from RNG Reporter to Pokefinder, which if I'm not mistaken were both created by Admiral Fish.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |